Comments on: Kudos to BabyTalk http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/ Deities. Dogma. Dating. Diapers. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:27:17 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2 by: Sabrina http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/#comment-1862 Mon, 07 Aug 2006 18:01:06 +0000 http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/#comment-1862 When I heard about thoses reactions I laughed. How people can be shocked ????? That's one the most natural thing !!!! When I heard about thoses reactions I laughed.

How people can be shocked ????? That’s one the most natural thing !!!!

]]> by: Alison http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/#comment-1773 Mon, 31 Jul 2006 23:08:32 +0000 http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/#comment-1773 I don't get BabyTalk anymore but OMG how could people, no wait, MOTHERS, be offended? That is the most offensive thing of all! I don’t get BabyTalk anymore but OMG how could people, no wait, MOTHERS, be offended? That is the most offensive thing of all!

]]> by: Laura http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/#comment-1738 Fri, 28 Jul 2006 16:14:20 +0000 http://ftlog.meanderwithme.com/2006/07/kudos-to-babytalk/#comment-1738 Blogging Baby picked up on that story yesterday, focussing on the objections of the prurient-minded. http://www.bloggingbaby.com/2006/07/27/naked-breast-on-magazine-cover-causes-uproar/ To too many Americans, breasts are solely sexual. Not even 'primarily', and certainly not 'secondarily', but solely. Given how Puritan-squeamish Americans are about sex, it's not surprising that they can't perceive of a breast, even when used for its PRIMARY purpose of feeding an infant, as anything but sexual, and thus "gross". How sad. How sick. Blogging Baby picked up on that story yesterday, focussing on the objections of the prurient-minded.

http://www.bloggingbaby.com/2006/07/27/naked-breast-on-magazine-cover-causes-uproar/

To too many Americans, breasts are solely sexual. Not even ‘primarily’, and certainly not ’secondarily’, but solely. Given how Puritan-squeamish Americans are about sex, it’s not surprising that they can’t perceive of a breast, even when used for its PRIMARY purpose of feeding an infant, as anything but sexual, and thus “gross”.

How sad. How sick.

]]>